技术资料

Human blastocyst-derived,pluripotent cell lines are described that have normal karyotypes,express high levels of telomerase activity,and express cell surface markers that characterize primate embryonic stem cells but do not characterize other early lineages. After undifferentiated proliferation in vitro for 4 to 5 months,these cells still maintained the developmental potential to form trophoblast and derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers,including gut epithelium (endoderm); cartilage,bone,smooth muscle,and striated muscle (mesoderm); and neural epithelium,embryonic ganglia,and stratified squamous epithelium (ectoderm). These cell lines should be useful in human developmental biology,drug discovery,and transplantation medicine. View Publication

Recent reports on the characteristics of naive human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) obtained using independent methods differ. Naive hPSCs have been mainly derived by conversion from primed hPSCs or by direct derivation from human embryos rather than by somatic cell reprogramming. To provide an unbiased molecular and functional reference,we derived genetically matched naive hPSCs by direct reprogramming of fibroblasts and by primed-to-naive conversion using different naive conditions (NHSM,RSeT,5iLAF and t2iLGöY). Our results show that hPSCs obtained in these different conditions display a spectrum of naive characteristics. Furthermore,our characterization identifies KLF4 as sufficient for conversion of primed hPSCs into naive t2iLGöY hPSCs,underscoring the role that reprogramming factors can play for the derivation of bona fide naive hPSCs. View Publication

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) nomenclature remains ambiguous and there is a general lack of concordance in the stem cell field with many distinct cell subtypes continually grouped under the term EPC." It would be highly advantageous to agree on standards to confirm an endothelial progenitor phenotype and this should include detailed immunophenotyping potency assays and clear separation from hematopoietic angiogenic cells which are not endothelial progenitors. In this review we seek to discourage the indiscriminate use of "EPCs and instead propose precise terminology based on defining cellular phenotype and function. Endothelial colony forming cells and myeloid angiogenic cells are examples of two distinct and well-defined cell types that have been considered EPCs because they both promote vascular repair,albeit by completely different mechanisms of action. It is acknowledged that scientific nomenclature should be a dynamic process driven by technological and conceptual advances; ergo the ongoing EPC" nomenclature ought not to be permanent and should become more precise in the light of strong scientific evidence. This is especially important as these cells become recognized for their role in vascular repair in health and disease and in some cases progress toward use in cell therapy. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:1316-1320. View Publication