Seeger FH et al. (MAR 2007)
European heart journal 28 6 766--72
Cell isolation procedures matter: a comparison of different isolation protocols of bone marrow mononuclear cells used for cell therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
AIM: The recently published REPAIR-AMI and ASTAMI trial showed differences in contractile recovery of left ventricular function after infusion of bone marrow-derived cells in acute myocardial infarction. Since the trials used different protocols for cell isolation and storage (REPAIR-AMI: Ficoll,storage in X-vivo 10 medium plus serum; ASTAMI: Lymphoprep,storage in NaCl plus plasma),we compared the functional activity of BMC isolated by the two different protocols. METHODS AND RESULTS: The recovery of total cell number,colony-forming units (CFU),and the number of mesenchymal stem cells were significantly reduced to 77 +/- 4%,83 +/- 16%,and 65 +/- 15%,respectively,when using the ASTAMI protocol compared with the REPAIR protocol. The capacity of the isolated BMC to migrate in response to stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) was profoundly reduced when using the ASTAMI cell isolation procedure (42 +/- 8% and 78 +/- 3% reduction in healthy and CAD-patient cells,respectively). Finally,infusion of BMC into a hindlimb ischaemia model demonstrated a significantly blunted blood-flow-recovery by BMC isolated with the ASTAMI protocol (54 +/- 6% of the effect obtained by REPAIR cells). Comparison of the individual steps identified the use of NaCl and plasma for cell storage as major factors for functional impairment of the BMC. CONCLUSION: Cell isolation protocols have a major impact on the functional activity of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells. The assessment of cell number and viability may not entirely reflect the functional capacity of cells in vivo. Additional functional testing appears to be mandatory to assure proper cell function before embarking on clinical cell therapy trials.
View Publication
产品类型:
产品号#:
04564
04534
04544
产品名:
入门套件MethoCult™H4534经典无EPO
MethoCult™H4534经典无EPO
MethoCult™H4534经典无EPO
文献
Shirato K et al. ( 2017)
Virology November 0--1
Wild-type human coronaviruses prefer cell-surface TMPRSS2 to endosomal cathepsins for cell entry
Human coronaviruses (HCoVs) enter cells via two distinct pathways: the endosomal pathway using cathepsins to activate spike protein and the cell-surface or early endosome pathway using extracellular proteases such as transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). We previously reported that clinical isolates of HCoV-229E preferred cell-surface TMPRSS2 to endosomal cathepsin for cell entry,and that they acquired the ability to use cathepsin L by repeated passage in cultured cells and were then able to enter cells via the endosomal pathway. Here,we show that clinical isolates of HCoV-OC43 and -HKU1 preferred the cell-surface TMRRSS2 to endosomal cathepsins for cell entry,similar to HCoV-229E. In addition,the cell-culture-adapted HCoV-OC43 lost the ability to infect and replicate in air-liquid interface cultures of human bronchial tracheal epithelial cells. These results suggest that circulating HCoVs in the field generally use cell-surface TMPRSS2 for cell entry,not endosomal cathepsins,in human airway epithelial cells.
View Publication